• [ Pobierz caÅ‚ość w formacie PDF ]

    the Gunas, through Tamas, Rajas, and Sattva, then
    learn that in ordinary life man is connected with
    wisdom and virtue through Sattva, with the
    passions and affections, with the thirst for
    existence through Rajas; and that through Tamas
    he is connected with idleness, nonchalance and
    sleepiness. Why does a man in ordinary life feel
    enthusiasm for wisdom and virtue? Because he is
    related to the basic nature characterised by Sattva.
    Why does a man in ordinary life feel joy and
    longing for the external life, feel pleasure in the
    external phenomena of life? Because he has a
    relation to life indicated through Rajas. Why do
    people go through ordinary life sleepy, lazy and
    inactive? Why do they feel oppressed by their
    corporality? Why do they not find it possible
    continually to rouse themselves and conquer their
    bodily nature? Because they are connected with
    the world of external forms which in Sankhya
    philosophy is expressed through Tamas. But the
    soul of the wise man must become free from
    Tamas, must sever its connection with the external
    world expressed by sleepiness, laziness and
    inactivity. When these are expunged from the soul,
    then it is only connected with the external world
    through Rajas and Sattva. When a man has
    extinguished his passions and affections and the
    thirst for existence, retaining the enthusiasm for
    virtue, compassion and knowledge, his connection
    with the external world henceforth is what
    Sankhya philosophy calls Sattva. But when a man
    has also become liberated from that tendency to
    goodness and knowledge, when, although a kindly
    and wise man, he is independent of his outward
    expression even as regards kindness and
    knowledge; when kindness is a natural duty and
    wisdom as something poured out over him, then
    he has also severed his connection with Sattva.
    When, however, he has thus stripped off the three
    Gunas, then he has freed himself from all
    connection with every external form, then he
    triumphs in his soul and understands something of
    what the great Krishna wants to make of him.
    What, then, does man grasp, when he thus strives
    to become what the great Krishna holds before
    him as the ideal-what does he then understand?
    Does he then more clearly understand the forms of
    the outer world? No, he had already understood
    these; but he has raised himself above them. Does
    he more clearly grasp the relation of the soul to
    those external forms? No, he had already grasped
    that, but he has raised himself above it. It is not
    that which he may meet with in the external world
    in the multitude of forms, or his connection with
    these forms, which he now understands when he
    strips off the three Gunas; for all that belongs to
    earlier stages. As long as one remains in Tamas,
    Rajas, or Sattva, one becomes connected with the
    natural rudiments of existence, adapts oneself to
    social relationships and to knowledge, and
    acquires the qualities of kindness and sympathy.
    But if one has risen above all that, one has stripped
    off all these connections at the preceding stages.
    What does one then perceive, what springs up
    before one's eyes? That which one perceives and
    which springs up before one is what these are not.
    What can that be which is distinct from everything
    one acquires along the path of the Gunas.
    This is none other than what one finally recognise
    as one's own being, for all else which may belong
    to the external world has been stripped away at the
    preceding stages. In the sense of the foregoing,
    what is this? It is Krishna himself; for he is
    himself the expression of what is highest in
    oneself. This means that when one has worked
    oneself up to the highest, one is face to face with
    Krishna, the pupil with his great Teacher, Arjuna
    with Krishna himself: who lives in all things that
    exist and who can truly say of himself:  I am not a
    solitary mountain, if I am among the mountains I
    am the largest of them all; if I appear upon the
    earth I am not a single man, but the greatest
    human manifestation, one that only appears once
    in a cosmic age as a leader of mankind, and so on;
    the unity in all forms, that am I, Krishna.  Thus
    does the teacher himself appear to his pupil,
    present in his own Being. At the same time it is
    made clear in the Bhagavad Gita that this is
    something great and mighty, the highest to which a
    man can attain. To appear before Krishna, as did
    Arjuna, might come about through gradual stages
    of initiation; it would then take place in the depths
    of a Yoga schooling; but it may also be represented
    as flowing forth from the evolution of humanity
    itself, given to man by an act of grace, as it were,
    and thus it is represented in the Gita. Arjuna was
    uplifted suddenly at a bound, as it were, so that
    bodily he has Krishna before him; and the Gita
    leads up to a definite. point, the point at which
    Krishna stood before him. He does not now stand
    before him as a man of flesh and blood. A man
    who could be looked upon as other men would
    represent what is nonessential in Krishna. For that
    is essential which is in all men; but as the other
    kingdoms of the world represent, as it were, only
    scattered humanity, so all that is in the rest of the
    world is in Krishna. The rest of the world
    disappears and Krishna is there as ONE. As the
    macrocosm to the microcosm, as mankind, as a
    whole, compared to the small everyday man, so is
    Krishna to the individual man.
    Human power of comprehension is not sufficient [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]

  • zanotowane.pl
  • doc.pisz.pl
  • pdf.pisz.pl
  • matkadziecka.xlx.pl